
Before the NCAA makes it selections, the conference tournaments must take place and declare a winner that will receive the only official automatic berth into the tournament. This year, this was USC’s only chance of making it to the post season. After a midseason slump and one too many a loss the chance of actually winning three straight games against ranked opponents, including rival UCLA, seemed slim at best. However a little determination, and desperation, goes along way. Injury free and tournament bound, the Trojans relied on every group’s greatest weapon: teamwork. The loyalty to the team over oneself is the main catalyst of the tournament. “One and done” wonders and leading scorers can only carry you so far. When the Michigan State shut down Taj Gibson in the 2nd round, the Trojans stayed in the game by relying on Daniel Hackett and Dwight Lewis to pick up the scoring slack and make up for the fact that Gibson managed to score only three points the whole game. They still came extremely close to beating Michigan State. Had they relied one player whether it had been Gibson, or freshman DeMar DeRozan it would have been detrimental to their success. Former NBA great David Robinson explains teamwork as such: “Each player contributes his own gifts and efforts so that the great goal–winning–can be reached. But players who seek their own glory at the sacrifice of the team’s glory drive the team away from success.” The Trojans stayed loyal to each other and thus found success in both tournaments.
What, however, is a tournament, if no one watches? The NCAA picks neutral sites. Though a high seed may get the advantage of staying within their region, no one gets a true home court advantage in the post season. To help create the allusion of a home court advantage and thus give your team the upper hand, fans must travel. The tournament counts on the fact that certain fans will travel in large groups, spending their precious dollars on tickets and merchandise. Fan loyalty not only helps create the home court advantage for the teams, but revenue for the NCAA. And if it weren’t for all the revenue the NCAA was making off those loyal fans, they wouldn’t have the money to charter a flight for every team and their respective pep bands and cheerleaders, put them up in a nice hotel, provide free meals for the team and per diem ($ 40 a day) for the spirit groups and still have enough to pay everyone running the tournament itself. Though this is not the only way the tournament makes money (We can’t forget the ever lucrative television contracts and advertisements), this is the sort of loyalty that literally keeps the tournament up and running.
That being said, it is known throughout the collegiate world that certain fans are more loyal than others. Though schools that draw larger crowds can more than make up for others in sales, it leaves teams with fewer crowds without even the chance of any sort of home court advantage. That is where university loyalty is key. The NCAA does pay for a certain amount of band members and other spirit groups to fly out with the team, but it takes a group of dedicated members to give up either the very beginning or very end of their spring break for it to actually become a reality. Good bye Cabo. Good bye Palm Springs. Hello Minneapolis: Home of the Mall of America, the Golden Gophers, and really not much else. Nonetheless, I, along with some of my cohorts (Such as the Song Girls and Spirit Leaders pictured below) packed our bags and flew from 80 degree Los Angeles to 40 degree Minneapolis to partake in something bigger than ourselves. After spe
nding the semester studying rhetoric, I noticed how each school’s band and spirit groups helped create a narrative by which all the fans and/or players understood. “Rock Chalk Jay Hawk” has no meaning to me, but when fans chanted it, helped invigorate the Kansas players and intimidate the opposing Dayton Flyers. Likewise, playing “Tribute to Troy” signaled to our opponents that USC had arrived, but more over, it is known throughout the USC community as inspiration. The understanding between university members creates maybe not the most important loyalty of the tournament, but be assured, it is the strongest.
Inter-team loyalty. Fan loyalty. University loyalty. The interdependency of this entire entity is what makes the NCAA tournament as successful as it is. Of course there are lucrative television contracts, ad sales, sponsorships and pools in Las Vegas betting on each game, but that can all exist because of this basic element. Whether it makes a team strong enough to reach the tournament beyond all odds or makes the Metrodome feel like the Galen Center, it all comes to down to a special symbiotic relationship that might not make the world go round, but it keeps “the madness” alive.

Inter-team loyalty. Fan loyalty. University loyalty. The interdependency of this entire entity is what makes the NCAA tournament as successful as it is. Of course there are lucrative television contracts, ad sales, sponsorships and pools in Las Vegas betting on each game, but that can all exist because of this basic element. Whether it makes a team strong enough to reach the tournament beyond all odds or makes the Metrodome feel like the Galen Center, it all comes to down to a special symbiotic relationship that might not make the world go round, but it keeps “the madness” alive.
Stephanie, thank you for an enlightening post. You successfully explore the reasons for the madness behind March Madness. And though you mentioned that you wanted to have a more journalistic post, your entry made me feel as if I was there! I think it was great that you were able to identify three types of loyalty than contribute to the madness: inter-team, fan, and university. I, too, agree that those three types make college athletics as great as it is. Yet you also discuss the financial and business aspects of the madness. Your argument is multi-dimensional and clearly shows how critically you’ve analyzed this phenomenon.
ReplyDeleteHowever, I think expanding on some of the topics you mentioned would greatly strengthen your post. What exactly can be done to increase or improve the three types, whether it is inter-team, fan, or university loyalty? How could we improve attendance at the basketball games at the Galen center? How do we make basketball as important as football on the “university loyalty” level?
I have to admit that I am definitely more a basketball fan at heart. Though coming to USC has me converted to USC football, I prefer the pace of basketball, the madness, and the NBA. So, I am very excited to see our basketball program improving and look forward to the next season.